| |
Cut Through Street versus Historic Arch Bridge
The fate of an historic, concrete arch bridge is up in the air.
Folsom’s Public Works Department proposes to tear down and replace the
Orangevale Avenue Bridge for safety reasons. The Heritage Preservation
League of Folsom feels that a new bridge will only serve to benefit
cut-through traffic on that road. The League endorses another plan to
address safety and preserve the bridge, which has historic value.
The Orangevale Bridge is the oldest automobile bridge in Sacramento
County still in use. Built in 1915, it was once a part of the first
transcontinental Lincoln Highway. Early-day motorists entering Folsom
from the West made a short detour off of Greenback Lane to cross the
bridge. That ended in 1948 when Greenback was extended through to
Folsom. The bridge now lies on a quiet, residential road near American
River Canyon Drive.

1915 Orangevale Avenue Bridge View One.
The Orangevale Bridge was the prototype for the Rainbow Bridge that
spans the American River. Both were designed and built by the same
architect within two years of each other. While the Rainbow was
widened and modernized, the Orangevale Bridge has been left untouched
over time. Along with the surrounding area, it looks much the same as
when it was a main highway. Nancy Percy, of the Heritage Preservation
League, calls the well-preserved bridge “a celebration of the advent
of the automobile”.

1915 Orangevale Avenue Bridge View Two.
The Folsom Public Works Department wants to build a 43 foot wide,
box-like concrete bridge in its place. The width of the existing
bridge is a safety concern according to City engineers. Although City
records show only two minor accidents on the bridge in the past 8
years, officials contend that the City could be held liable for future
accidents if no action is taken.
The Heritage Preservation League and the Lincoln Highway Association
have a much simpler plan. Proposed by retired bridge engineers Norman
Root and Lloyd Johnson, and Lincoln Highway Association Chapter
President Robert Dieterich, the 20-foot wide bridge would become a
one-lane road. Signs placed on both sides of the bridge would inform
motorists to yield to oncoming traffic.
According to Robert Dieterich, converting an older bridge to
one-lane is a common and effective way to make it safe and extend its
useful life. Mr. Dieterich cites the Webber Creek Bridge near
Placerville and Buck’s Bar Bridge on the Cosumnes River as similar in
age, width and traffic use to the Orangevale Bridge. Both adequately
accommodate traffic with no apparent safety problems. There are about
1,500 one-lane bridges in California.

Model A on bridge.
Safety issue aside, the Public Works Department wants to build a
wider, faster bridge that would destroy the existing one. The
Preservation League opts for a traffic calming measure that will
preserve the historic bridge. Who will benefit from each proposal?
There are fewer than 100 homes in the immediate vicinity that might
potentially use the Orangevale Bridge for residential access. A recent
traffic count of 2,000 cars per day suggests that the bridge is used
primarily as a short cut between Folsom and Orangevale. It helps
motorists avoid traffic lights on Greenback Lane. Some residents
believe that widening the bridge will increase its appeal for
cut-through traffic. One local resident who walks and bicycles across
the bridge fears that increased traffic speed from a wider bridge will
make the road more dangerous for pedestrians.
Local resident, Tony Powers, says the width of the current bridge
creates a “natural traffic calming effect” that causes motorists to
slow down and take turns when crossing. Proponents of a one-lane
bridge state that this plan would simply enforce what most motorists
already do. They prefer a one-lane bridge in order to preserve the
rural character of the area along with the historic bridge.

Bucks Bar Bridge.
The Public Works Department cites other reasons for replacing the
Orangevale Bridge. A posted 10-ton load limit currently prevents fire
trucks from using the bridge. While some confusion about the bridge‘s
weight capacity existed in the 80s and 90s, two recent bridge
inspections by the California Department of Transportation indicate
that there should be no weight limit at all posted on the bridge.
Reports from Cal Trans inspections done in 2001 and 2003 show that the
bridge is good for all legal loads (including fire trucks).
Public Works officials also cite the age of the bridge and the fact
that it was given a 50-year estimated life span as reason for
replacement. Former Cal Trans engineer Norman Root states that it was
a standard practice at that time to assign all bridges a 50-year life
span. This includes a concrete arch bridge near Dunsmuir that was
built in 1916. The Dunsmuir Bridge currently carries Southbound
freeway traffic on Interstate 5. Cal Trans has no plans to replace it.
Statewide, about 200 concrete arch bridges built between 1909 and the
late1930s are still in use.

Webber Creek Bridge.
Though in good condition and high in historic value, the Orangevale
Bridge does seem to suffer from lack of visibility. Many residents
don’t know it exists. Once easily seen from Greenback Lane, vegetation
growth has obscured the bridge in recent years. City planners like to
cite this as a reason for not preserving the bridge. The vegetation
near the bridge is located in a steep ravine with limited access.
Heritage Preservation League Vice President, Loretta Hettinger, points
out that the bridge could be “one September fire season away” from
being very visible again.
Folsom residents value the city's history. Much effort and expense
have gone into preserving the historic character of the town. The City
Council recently decided to add decorative arches to the Natomas
Crossing Bridge in order to compliment its historic companion
upstream. Now a pair of historically authentic arches lie in the
balance. Folsom has a choice between a new, wider bridge that makes
for a better short cut, or a traffic-calming old bridge that adds to
the town’s historic legacy. The City Council is expected to take up
the matter shortly.
|
|